|
|
What
is the What — Dave
Eggers
When
I was little, my grandmother had a “foster child” in
Korea, through the Foster Parents Plan. The organization was started
by an Englishman during the Spanish Civil War, and offered a personal
approach to humanitarian aid. The sponsor contributed to the health
care and education of an individual child, as well as community
projects, and the relationship was enhanced by exchanging letters
and photos with the children.
Grandma
used to show me black-and-white snapshots of the little Korean
boy she wrote to, and letters from him and the local aid workers,
all in the Korean script, angular and elegant. In my suburban Canadian
childhood, in the much-less-worldly ’50s, I was powerfully
impressed by that glimpse of a world that was so exotic—so alien.
In retrospect, it must have been one of my first inklings of how
different, and how fascinating, other people and places could be.
As
a grownup, I followed Grandma’s example, and sponsored several
children myself through the Foster Parents Plan. Having become
moderately successful, I tried to live by the principle, “If
you do well, you should try to do good,” and I was involved
in many humanitarian and environmental causes. I especially liked
the personal nature of the Foster Parents Plan, but perhaps it
was inevitable that I would get to care about
those children—like the unforgettable Yamira Francia Espinosa,
from the impoverished province of Buenaventura, in Colombia. The
Foster Parents Plan sent me colorful drawings and warm letters
from Yamira, full of expressions of joy and love, and adorable
snapshots of her and her mother. Like most dads, I was a pushover
for a sweet little girl, and for several years I wrote her letters
and sent photos of me and my family. Then the organization suddenly
informed me that because Yamira had reached the age of 13, she
was no longer “eligible” for the program. They sent
me a file and photos of another needy child, from another country,
and though I understood what they were trying to do—help
as many children as they could—another child could not so
easily take the place of Yamira Francia Espinosa.
I
recount that experience because of course I have always wondered
what became of Yamira, and of another foster child I had at the
same time, a boy from the Sudan. In turn, I mention him because
Dave Eggers’s latest work, What is the What, is
based on the true story of a boy from the Sudan—a country
almost without peer in its sufferings, from drought, famine, corruption,
civil war, genocide, anarchy, pestilence, disease, you name it.
Dave
Eggers became a literary phenomenon with his first book, A
Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius. The
title was ironic, of course, but time may prove it fairly accurate.
The combination of talent, youth, daring, caring, and depth of character revealed
in that book completely absorbed me. His next novel, You Shall
Know Our Velocity,
remains one of my all-time favorites—a book I simply loved—and
Eggers made an admirable statement of personal principle by releasing
the first edition exclusively through independent bookstores. I
admire that kind of maverick activism, like the time Stephen King
did a book tour by motorcycle (yeah!), visiting only independent
stores.
Eggers’s
next publication was a wide-ranging story collection called How
We Are Hungry, and
meanwhile, using the leverage of his success, he was active in
a more pragmatic way—helping to launch a publishing house,
McSweeney’s. That imprint might be the literary equivalent
of an “indie” record label, or a fine-art book publisher—conceived
by dedicated artisans who actually lived and worked by the principle
of “Art for art’s sake.” (And, as 10CC sang, “Money
for god’s sake.”) McSweeney’s has produced many
adventurous, worthwhile, and moderately subversive editions, with
imaginative bindings and gratuitous examples of the “bookmaker’s” craft.
(And for once, the definition of “gratuitous” is entirely
apt: “gra·tu·i·tous adj 1. unnecessary
and unjustifiable 2. received or given without payment or obligation
3. not requiring any benefit or compensation in return.” That’s
a pretty good definition of art for art’s sake—from
a businessman’s point-of-view, anyway.)
The
publication of What is the What merited
a front-page review in the New York Times Book
Review, which is a signal honor. As a fan of Eggers’s previous
books, I dove eagerly into that review, but reading the synopsis
of the story, I wasn’t sure I would be so keen to read that
book.
As
a potential reader, you have to think, “Do I really want
to suffer through a story about a child who escaped alone from
the Sudan as it was torn apart by warring gangs of heavily-armed
thugs who destroyed his village and murdered his neighbors, who
survived in Kenyan refugee camps for ten years, until finally he
made his way to the United States—where he was beaten and
robbed by American thieves?”
The
short answer is, yes, I do.
I
am constantly amazed by the transformation a great artist can achieve
by filtering harsh reality through a fine sensibility—transforming
an ugly story into something of beauty. (Here’s a vague quote
along those lines—the kind I remember from somewhere, but
can’t find its attribution: “Art is reality filtered
through a sensibility.”) All of the arts are capable of this
apotheosis (especially painting, it occurs to me), and in literature,
it began with the Greeks, Cervantes, and Shakespeare. In more modern
times, just to mention a few examples, I think of Nelson Algren’s The
Man With the Golden Arm,
Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath, Ann-Marie MacDonald’s Fall on Your Knees,
Chinua Achebe’s classic African trilogy beginning with Things
Fall Apart, and in
a similar vein, Ayi Kwei Armah’s The Beautyful Ones Are
Not Yet Born. These
are not “pretty” stories, but they are beautiful works
of art.
Thinking
farther and wider, so much of modern literature, especially the
powerful wave of realism that spread from Balzac and Zola across
to the New World, and America’s 20th century, reflects that
grit and sensibility. Sinclair Lewis, Theodore Dreiser, F. Scott
Fitzgerald—sometimes thought of as exemplifying a romantic,
almost decadent, sensibility, but that can be seen as more of a
typical 20th century focus on his image. Similarly,
Hemingway’s personal celebrity, like Jack London’s
before him, made his novels “read” differently. Fitzgerald’s
arguable masterpiece, The Great Gatsby, is
not a glamorous, romantic story, it is sordid and tragic—but
its telling is beautiful.
The
definition of art as a combination of Truth and Beauty traces back
to Plato, and still holds. Truth may also be the province of journalism,
history, science, and biography (ideally), and beauty can be created
by designers—industrial visionaries, architects, and decorative
artists—but the combination of the two is the sublime, transcendent
province of genuine art. I remember feeling enlightened when I
learned that the term “fine art” comes from the French fin—the
end. Art as the end, art for art’s sake.
And
that transcendent transformation of injustice into art is what
Dave Eggers has accomplished with What is the What. One
of the lessons that art, especially literature, can bring to us
is the recognition that the world’s strangeness is not so
alien after all. The story of the Sudanese boy you come to know
as Valentino is told with such a natural progression of events
and his reactions to them that you simply understand him.
What he’s faced with, what he does, and what he feels about
it, are what you can imagine you would experience in such dire
circumstances. Valentino tries to avoid danger, makes the best
of the world he encounters, and tries to make it better if he can,
for himself and for others. That may be the highest expression
of humanity.
As
with all great fiction, there is much more to Dave Eggers’s
story than what it’s “about.” A Heartbreaking
Work of Staggering Genius was “about” two
young orphans. You Shall Know Our Velocity was “about” an
idealistic young man who thinks he can do a good deed without being
punished. Similarly, What is the What is
not “about” the misadventures of a Sudanese refugee.
It is about all of us.
As
literature, I think What is the What is
a modern masterpiece, by a gifted artist of early promise who has
now matured enough as a writer and as a human being to dare to
co-opt another person’s life—a real person’s
life, it should be stressed—and transform it into a tale
of truth and beauty. To a modern citizen of the world, there is
no doubt that Valentino’s story is a tale that deserves to
be told, but that doesn’t make it art. It is the talent,
vision, courage, and ambition of Dave Eggers that makes this story
timeless and transcendent—true and beautiful.
I
have never met Dave Eggers, but I just get this feeling he’s “my
kind of guy.” The foreword to A Heartbreaking Work of
Staggering Genius includes
an itemized list of how he spent the advance he was paid for the
book; the usual “boilerplate” publishing data is riddled
with jokes; and the later addendum, Mistakes We Knew We Were
Making, enumerates
the liberties he had taken with the facts for the sake of the story.
The
world could use more artists, and more human beings, like Dave
Eggers. My recommendation is to read this book. In fact, read all
his books.
|
|
|